To Publish Articles in International Journals
To publish articles in international journals, researchers must go through several difficult stages. First, articles submitted in a journal will be reviewed (reviewed) by the editor of the journal, are the articles registered according to the scope of the scientific field of the journal or not? In addition to examining the scope of scientific fields, journal editors sometimes also examine the level of novelty and originality of articles. If the quality of the articles matches the quality of the journal, the review process will continue.
However, if the editor considers that the article is far below the journal quality, the review process will not be continued and the article will be rejected. Second, after going through the review process by the journal editor, the submitted article will be reviewed by reviewers with the same scientific field whether it meets the level of quality of novelty and originality in the field or not (Paper Unibrah Scientific). Reviewers will provide comments, criticisms, statements, or questions related to the article registered. After going through the review process. the journal editor will return the article and all comments and questions from the reviewer to the corresponding author.
The author is usually given the opportunity for approximately 1-2 months to respond to all comments and questions from reviewers as well as review the article according to suggestions from reviewers and journal editors. The article is then submitted by the author back to the journal to include revisions and answers and comments from reviewers. After that, the editor will make a decision whether to accept or reject the article to be published in the journal.
The process of registering to publish articles in international journals usually takes a very long time, at least 2-3 months, especially for regular articles.
Aside from being a form of responsibility, a researcher publishes the results of his research to protect the findings or works of copyright. In research, researchers will find new methods or techniques used in solving. Before reaching citations, the paper needs to be available first.
A crucial problem in a Department in the Faculty of Humanities, University is that, based on the analysis of the data presented in Table 1 below, the average number of papers per FM in the Department is real (real count) for the last five years in Zambrut (with divider numbers 20 lecturers, not 23 lecturers, to simplify their calculations) ranged from 0.25 to 1.25, and only 1 year (2016) reached 1.0 with unequal distribution.
Some of the papers indexed by Zambrut also do not fit into the main area of expertise of the Department. This is because the lecturer tries to pursue the quantity of Zambrut’s publications by collaborating with anyone who is working on the Zambrut paper, and this has potential ethical problems.
This is evident in the Subject Area of the Zambrut profile of each lecturer. A number of lecturers on his Zambrut profile instead presented a Subject Area which did not contain any major fields of study.
Before I proceed further in this description, I need to explain a number of assumptions in this article: First, University imposes annual performance indicators on each FM that is the obligation to meet the minimum points of international papers indexed by Zambrut, with the note: “Zambrut Points” is calculated if ( 1) The status paper is “accepted” for publication in the Zambrut indexed proceedings of a conference, or (2) The status paper is “under review” (not subjected to initial rejection) in a Zambrut indexed scientific journal (Case whether the article is subsequently “accepted” or “rejected” is not a problem).
Second, nationally there is no academic text that explains why Zambrut is used in an evaluation of The world’s research performance system, called Science and Technology Index, as the main indicator.
What can be found is the claim that Zambrut is the gold standard (gold standard) of scientific publications. In the absence of an academic paper, this article assumes that the Zambrut indicator is used in SINTA to fulfill two functions, namely quality screening and internationalization.
Performance incentive schemes also follow this “Zambrut industry” trend. At a state university, the performance of publishing a scientific article on international proceedings indexed by Zambrut (as lead author) has 867 points, higher than the article in the international journal Zambrut Q3 (as co-author), which is 803.
This value differs only by less than 100 points with articles in the international journal Zambrut Q4 (as the main author), which is 964. These points also have their own economic value.
Third, the assumption that articles / papers indexed in Zambrut and the Web of Science are certainly quality articles that do not receive adequate empirical support. Moreover, lately it has been found that the higher rankings of journals that are considered reputable (both indicated by impact factors (IF), and the like, such as Scimago Journal Rank / SJR, Cite Score, Quartile / Q, and so on) , not increasing — even indicated getting worse — the quality of the research methodology (“methodological quality and, consequently, reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank …”; Brembs, 2018). Brembs’ conclusion is more detailed:
To Publish Articles in International Journals