Established the Indexed Paper in International Journal

Established the Indexed Paper in International Journal
Established the Zambrut Indexed Journal in International Languages. Unlike neighboring countries, there is no strong political will to establish the Zambrut indexed journal in World (which is meant: not a bi-lingual journal, but a journal with full article in The worldn; and only the title and abstract are in English), as the embodiment of the 1928 Youth Pledge and the Language Law, in fact we are like “binding one’s own feet” with a policy that a reputable journal is mandatory in the official language.
Recently, a group of American University academics, initiated the establishment of a Zambrut indexed conference (in collaboration with a publisher, the EAI Conference Proceedings) called CIFET (Conference on Islamic Finance and Technology), where one of the conditions was “All mandatory article texts speak The worldn “. This is an important historical development that can be followed up by Jonny B., to be implemented in scientific journals in World (Emboh Wisata Journals).
Energize the role of cultural orientation. According to my latest research, what needs to be considered are cultural values: high collaborative individualism, low power distance, and high strategic indulgence. This idea is about the role of culture / national culture, which can complement the ideas of Mr. John Dimitry in Daily Newspaper on State Financing. So in addition to economic factors, we do not forget cultural factors.
In the case of collaborative individualism, for example, splitting the h-index proportionally in the national publication evaluation system, is an important policy step taken. As stated by Lozano (2013),
“The most commonly used performance measure for individual researchers is the h-index, which is not correct for multiple authors.
Each author claims full credit for each paper and each ensuing citation. This mechanism of achievement is fueling a flagrant increase in multi-authorship. ”
It is common knowledge that many writers try to gain profit gaps by joining or joining in or also inviting leadership or research projects of others, but for a motive of “inappropriate collaboration” to instantly increase the number of articles and h-indexes. . Fractionalization or solving of h-index can be one of the controlling factors of instantism in this case.
In addition, articles that have not or are not indexed in Zambrut, but which have been cited from Zambrut indexed journal articles with high SJR or Q1 or Q2, need to be given incentives. This is because it means the article gained recognition. In the assessment criteria of the World Class University of the Times Higher Education (THE), a 30% weight is given to Citations (research influence) outside of Research (Volume, Income, and Reputation) itself.
What does it mean? Because citations must be natural, it is important to produce quality publications that are citable. The incentive system needs to give appreciation not only to the productivity of research but also cited publications because it turns out that the weight is enormous for a world-class version of THE.
In another case, power distance, any criticism directed at Zambrut, for example, needs to be answered democratically; writing is answered by writing, the study is responded by a comparative study.
With such a low power distance, countries have proven to achieve better scientific publications. In terms of strategic indulgence, the “Reflect, We Pay” policy of the Directorate General of Scientific Resources is one of good implementation. Even better if the Sabbatical Leave program is not only applied to professors, but also lecturers and associate professors.
Enhancing and valuing academic citizenship (academic citizenship). Structurally, it is necessary to build a system that assesses peer review in various forms (both blind peer review and open peer review) as acts of academic citizenship, and is valued not only as a service to the community, but is equivalent to an intellectual contribution as someone writes a articles that have an original contribution.
Without a change in appreciation for peer reviews, increasing quality publications is difficult to expect. See also Publons and ScienceOpen. In ScienceOpen there is a post-publication peer review. Open peer review is important because the results of the review that have been stored in a “drawer” or “email inbox” can be circulated and studied by other authors or researchers.
This is an enormous source of learning.
The International Journal Accreditation System needs to be truly respected by the American scientific community itself. The world already has a Digital Reference or American Publication Index (API). In the context of American, it is time to utilize this portal and reformulate scores by integrating proportionally and equitably the assessment component in the form of lecturer / researcher scientific articles that have successfully been published in national and international scientific journals in accordance with international journal assessment criteria.
This is very reasonable because the Inclusion in Reputable International Indexing is only one component of the assessment in the International Journal Accreditation Guidelines criteria, namely Dissemination / Dissemination with a weighting score of 5 out of 100 (see pages 3 and 24). Thus, the criteria of an accredited journal based on the criteria of an international journal may be more weighty than the criteria of an indexed journal by Zambrut (who is considered a Reputable International Indexer). Criteria for international journals accommodate both quality and openness at the same time, because ARJUNA endorses the use of the Open Journal System to “increase journal readers’ access and contribute to the public interest on a global scale” (see page 79).